• Users Online: 257
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 7-13

Status of institutional delivery in a block of Western India


1 Resident, Department of Community Medicine, SBKS Medical Institute & Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara-391760, Gujarat, India
2 Professor, Department of Community Medicine, SBKS Medical Institute & Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara-391760, Gujarat, India
3 Assistant Professor, Biostatistics, Department of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Patan, India

Date of Web Publication13-Aug-2018

Correspondence Address:
Niraj Pandit
Professor, Department of Community Medicine, SBKS Medical Institute & Research Center, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara-391760, Gujarat, India
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2347-6486.238987

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Health of mother and children is an asset to the family, society and community. The contribution of institutional delivery in achieving the optimal health of a mother and a child is beyond doubt. The present study was conducted with the objective to know the status of institutional delivery in a block of Vadodara district of western India.
Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted during December 2011 to October 2012. The study participants were mother, who had delivered their live baby during 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2011 and living in Vadodara Block. One per cent of the total live births during that duration were selected as the study participants. Samples represent both urban and rural areas of Vadodara Block. The systemic stratified random sampling method was used for selection of participants.
Results: Majority 327 (90.6%) of the delivery was institutional. Among institutional delivery, 173 (47.9%) participants went to public health institution and 154 (42.7%) went to private health institution. The reasons for home delivery (9.4%) were dissatisfaction from the institution (hospital) 19 (56%), economic constrain 11(32%) and distance factor 4(12%).
Conclusion: Almost 90% of study participants delivered baby at institution. It is a positive trend observed in the achievement of government target to 100% institution deliveries. The home deliveries are still prevalent in illiterate and schedule caste and schedule tribe population.

Keywords: Institutional delivery, Home delivery, Vadodara block


How to cite this article:
Singh A K, Pandit N, Sharma D. Status of institutional delivery in a block of Western India. J Integr Health Sci 2013;1:7-13

How to cite this URL:
Singh A K, Pandit N, Sharma D. Status of institutional delivery in a block of Western India. J Integr Health Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Dec 3];1:7-13. Available from: https://www.jihs.in/text.asp?2013/1/1/7/238987




  Introduction Top


The contribution of institutional delivery in achieving the optimal health of a mother and a child is beyond explanation. The place of delivery is an important determinant which affects the health of the mother and the newborn. Institutional deliveries provide access to skilled person, assistance, drugs, equipment, and transport[1]. As per the National Population Policy 2000 of India, one of the goals is to achieve 80% institutional deliveries and 100% deliveries to be assisted by skilled health personnel by year 2015[2]. These are the two interventions, which are identified as important initiatives to reduce the maternal mortality ratio, an important goal of the fifth Millennium Development Goal[3].

Most of the maternal and childhood morbidity and mortality are prevented with skilled obstetric care[4],[5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has outlined the importance of skilled obstetric care in critical strategy for reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in developing countries[6]. WHO defines Skilled Birth Attendant (SBA) as “accredited health professional(s) who may be a midwife, doctor or nurse; who is competent in managing normal pregnancy and childbirth, as well as identifying, managing and referring mother and her baby when it get complicated [7].

Skilled birth attendant at delivery is a one of the indicator in monitoring of progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 which are to reduce the infant mortality rate and maternal mortality ratio by three quarters between 1990 and 2015[8]. It is important that mother deliver their babies in a suitable environment, where life saving support exists and hygienic conditions can help to reduce the risk of complications which attribute the illness or death to mother and child[9].

India accounts for more than twenty percent of global burden of maternal mortality and the largest number of maternal deaths.[10] A quarter of the world’s neonatal deaths occur in India[11]. Most of maternal morbidity and mortality are caused by Haemorrhage (29%), anaemia (19%), sepsis (16%), obstructed labour (10%), unsafe abortion (9%), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8%)[12]. The perinatal mortality has great contribution in reducing infant and childhood mortality rate. The main causes of perinatal mortality are intrauterine and birth asphyxia, low birth weight, birth trauma, and intrauterine or neonatal infections[13].

In India, only 46.6% of births are attended by a Skilled Birth Attendant (SBA) reported by United Nation in 2008[14]. Whereas in Gujarat, the institutional delivery had increased from 46.1% in District Level Household Survey [15] – 1 (DLHS-1) to 52.2% in DLHS-2 and 56.4% in DLHS-3. But there is wide variation as per DLHS reports [15] in district-wise data of Gujarat. The Gujarat Government targeted to achieve 100% institutional delivery, reduction of MMR to 100 per live births and reduction of IMR to 30 by 2015.

The Government of India has implemented large intersecting programmes to improve women’s and child’s health. Reproductive and Child Health –II, National Rural Heath Mission (NRHM) programme (2005-2012) including the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), a maternity incentive scheme under which all pregnant women living below poverty line (BPL) receive cash money to attend antenatal care, deliver baby in a health facility and receive postnatal checkup and recently, Ministry of Health has launched Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK) under NRHM, on 1st June 2011. In addition to above mentioned programmes of Govt. of India, Gujarat Govt. has also taken several other steps like Chiranjeevi Yojana, 108 emergency ambulance services to promote institutional delivery[16].

Looking to all above initiatives by state and central government to promote the Institutional delivery to reduce the maternal mortality as well as the perinatal mortality, the present study aimed to know the status of institutional delivery in Vadodara Taluka of Vadodara district.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study location: Vadodara block in Vadodara district of western Indian state Gujarat.

Study type: Cross sectional study

Study Period: December 2011 to October 2012

Study population: Mother, who had delivered her live baby during 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2011 and living in Vadodara block.

Sample selection: The data of registered live birth for year 2010-2011 was collected. During the time the registered live birth in municipal area (urban area) were 27753 as per report from the Chief Municipal Health Officer, Vadodara Municipal Corporation, Vadodara and the registered live birth in Vadodara rural area were 8335 as per report from the Chief District Health Officer, District Panchayat, Vadodara. The systemic stratified random sampling method was use for selection of participants.

Looking to feasibility of study, it was decided to take one per cent of the total live births of both areas as the study participants, thus 278 participants were from municipal area (urban) and 83 participants were from rural area, make the study population. The total sample size was 361 women. The Vadodara city has 13 wards. The 278 participants were selected from all wards of city. Thus there were 21 study participants from each ward. These 21 – 22 participants were selected purposely (first found first selected) equally from each of four corners of every ward. Similarly, there are 9 PHC areas in Vadodara taluka. The 83 study participants were selected form these 9 PHC area. There were 9 – 10 participants selected purposely (first found first selected) equally from each of four corners of every PHC areas.

Procedure: The list of the participants was taken from Anganwari centre with the help of Anganwadi worker the selected mother was approached. The participant was informed regarding the study viz. purpose of the study, method of the study to the head of family in the vernacular language. Written informed consent was obtained from the each participant. The pilot pre-tested questionnaire was used for data collection. Questionnaire had two parts. First parts contained socio-demographic details of study participants regarding age, sex, religion, marital status, education, occupation, income, addiction (tobacco and alcohol), drug using for any chronic illness etc. Second part of questionnaire consisted of specific question related to institutional delivery.

Statistical method: Collected data were cleaned and analyzed by Epi Info 7 software and SPSS version 20 software.


  Results Top


There were 278 (77.00%) participants from urban and 83 (23.00%) from rural areas. Among 361 participants one had delivered her baby en-route while going to institution for delivery. En-route delivery was considered as home delivery in study.

The socio-demographic characteristics of the respondent mothers (participants) are shown in table I. It was observed that 244 (67.6%) participants belong to age group 19 to 25 and 102 (28.3%) participants in age group 26 to 35. Almost 57% participants belonged to joint family while 42.9% participants belonged to nuclear family.

For the socio-economic classification, modified Prasad’s socio-economic classification was used. Majority of participants 178 (49.3%) and 135 (37.4%) belonged to upper and middle socio-economic class respectively, while only 88 (13.3%) belonged to lower socio-economic class [Table 1].
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristic of Participants (n=361)

Click here to view


293 (81.2%) participants delivered their live baby at term while 44 (12.2%) and 24 (6.6%) participants delivered at post-term and pre-term period of gestational age respectively. Out of 361, majority 327 (90.6%) mother delivered their baby at institution and only 34 (9.4%) participants delivered at home.

The reasons cited by those who opted for home delivery were primarily dissatisfaction from the institution (hospital) in 19 (56%) followed by economic constraint in 11 (32%) cases and distance factor in 4 (12%) cases [Table 2]. The dissatisfaction means they had bad experience about hospital system in past.
Table 2: Response / reason of home delivery participants

Click here to view


[Table 3] shows that there is relation between education and selection of delivery place, as education of mother increase the institution delivery selection is significantly increase (X 2 =47, P<0.001).
Table 3: Distribution of place of delivery Vs Education of participants

Click here to view


There was highly significant home delivery found in Schedule Tribe (ST) participants followed by Schedule Cast (SC) & Other Backward Class (OBC) and least in general community as shown in table (χ2=23.596, df = 6, P= 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4: Cast Category-wise distribution of place of delivery

Click here to view


Distance of institution from participants home does not make any significant difference in selection of place of delivery as shown in [Table 5]. There were 30 (88.24%) participants out of 34 who prefer home delivery in spite of having health institution within the 10 kms from their home. It was observed that place of birth significantly affect their survival as shown in [Table 6].
Table 5: Distribution of place of delivery with distance

Click here to view
Table 6: Distribution of child survival at the time of interview and place of delivery

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The DLHS – 3 (2007 – 2008)[16] shows that the institutional delivery in Gujarat was 56.4%. In present study, 90.6% deliveries were conducted at institutional level. This observation shows that in Gujarat there is a lot of improvement in promoting institutional delivery since last DLHS. Adamson PC[17] mentioned in his study in Karnataka, that among marginalized population 56.7% were institutional deliveries and 35.9% at home. In marginalized group there are many hurdles which prevent to go for institutional delivery. In present study, the major numbers of home deliveries were observed among schedule cast community who are considered marginalized in state. Geeta SP et al[18] found in their study that 69% of the total number of deliveries (n=2,211) in 2008 – 2009 in rural Nanded, Maharashtra were conducted in institutions. They found a substantial increase in the proportion of institutional deliveries since the implementation of NRHM. Panja TK et al[19] also found in their study that 73.1% deliveries (n = 324) were institutional out of which 11.1% were conducted in private facilities. Geeta SP et al[18] also found that 39% of the total number (n=2,211) of deliveries in 2008-2009 were conducted in the public health institutions and 30% in the private institutions. In present study, 173 (47.9%) participants went to public health institution and 154 (42.7%) went to private health institution for delivery during 2010 - 2011.

Literacy status of the mother, socio-economic class of the family and the type of family are strongly associated factors with place of delivery. In present study it was observed that 79.41% non – institutional deliveries (home deliveries) were in middle and lower social class. Kotnis SD at el[20] did a study with sample size (n = 1441) on home delivery in slum and found that home deliveries were more frequent in illiterate mothers (16.38%), while only 4.91% in literate mothers did home delivery. Around 78% of home deliveries were seen in middle and lower Socioeconomic class. They found that leading cause of home deliveries are customs (26.37%), economic problem (25.27%), spontaneous delivery (24.18%), homely atmosphere (13.19%) and not satisfied with service of hospitals (10.9%). In present study, among home delivery (n=34); 55.88% participants did deliver their babies at home due to their inconvenience in institution, 32.35% due to economic constraint and 11.77% cases due to distance factor. Kesterton at al[9] studied on institutional delivery in rural India and reported that distance to hospital is a major factor in choosing institution for delivery. They found that only 13.4 % (n=3027) institutional delivery occurred where the distance is more than 31kms from the home while 32.0% (6160) delivery occurred in less than 5 kms distant institutions.


  Conclusion Top


The study conclude that institutional delivery has increased markedly reflecting a positive trend which in due course will help in achieving the Gujarat government target of accomplishing 100% institutional deliveries. The home deliveries are still prevalent in illiterate and schedule cast population. The distance to the health care facilities is still seemingly small yet important hurdle.

Limitation and Recommendation:

The limitation of the present study was that the study was small sample size, but still it carry value to see the positive trend in Gujarat.

The government need to focus on overcoming hurdles in order to achieve the target for 2015. There is a need to focus on the weak links like distance, cast based preference, focus on illiterate population for early motivation for institution delivery, providing adequate staff at village or tribal level for counselling and reassurance. Also there is need to keep an eye on the status revealed through such small or big statewide studies.



 
  References Top

1.
Dasgupta A, Deb S. Intranatal care practices in a backward village of West Bengal. J Obstet Gynecol India 2009;59:312-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Indian National Commission on Population. National Population policy, 2000. New Delhi: National Commission on Population, 2000. 2p. (http://populationcommission.nic.in/npp_obj. htm, accessed on 25 September 2012).  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Venkat B, Sudish SB, Durvasal R. Millennium health goals and India: status and progress. Hyderabad: Administrative Staff College of India, 2004.p-18.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sundari TK. The untold story: how the health care systems in developing countries contributes to maternal mortality. Int. J Health Ser 1992, 22:513-528.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
World Health Organization: Making Pregnancy Safer: Skilled Birth Attendants. Geneva 2008.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Thaddeus S, Main D: Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:1091-1110.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
World Health Organization, International Confederation of Gynaecologists and Obstetrician: Making Pregnancy Safer the critical role of the skilled attendant: A joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
United Nation Millennium Development Goals Indicators. New York: United Nations; 2008. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kesterton AJ, Cleland J, Sloggett A, Ronsmans C. Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status; BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jun 6;10:30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Campbell OM, Graham WJ. On behalf of The Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group: strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. The lancet 2006, 368(9543): 1284-1299.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mavalankar D, Vora K, Prakasamma M: Achieving Millennium Development Goal 5: is India serious? Bull World Health Organ 2008, 86:243-243A.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
National Neonatal Forum: The State of India’s Newborns. New Delhi & Washington DC. National Neonatal Forum & Save the Children US, 2004.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Annual Report 2004. New Delhi: Government of India; 2004  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
K Park. Park’s Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 16th ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2000. P384.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), 2010. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: India. Gujarat: Mumbai: IIPS  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Deepak foundation project report. * Woman and Child Development Available on htt://www.karmayog.org/ngo/deepakf/upload/ 3215/Pr0jects%20Report.pdf Accessed on 22.09.2011  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Adamson PC, Karl Krupp, Bhavana NK, Freeman AH, Khan M, Madhivanan P. Are marginalized women being left behind? A population-based study of institutional deliveries in Karnataka, India. BMC Public Health 2012;12:30.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Geeta SP, Shashank SD, Chandrakant RP, Rahul NG, Sudhir DW. Trends in Choosing Place of Delivery and Assistance during Delivery in Nanded District, Maharashtra, India. J Health Popul Nutr 2011 Feb;29(1):71-76.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Panja TK, Mukhopadhyay DK, Sinha N, Saren AB, Sinhababu A, Biswas AB. Are institutional deliveries promoted by Janani Suraksha Yojana in a district of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health 2012;56:69-72.  Back to cited text no. 19
  [Full text]  
20.
Kotnis SD, Gokhale RM, Rayate MV. Why still home deliveries in urban slum dwellers? National Journal of Community Medicine 2012;3:85-88.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed921    
    Printed85    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded76    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal